In defence of myself and editors:
The other criticism I'm seeing is that this wiki has "favourites" in regards to articles, and we may neglect some other articles, which upsets certain users that vocalise - off-site - that the articles they want to see are not being prioritised or given content that they wish to see added. To this, I say:
You need to express criticism in appropriate places
And yes, we do have personal favourites
To the first: we have a "requests" section on our wiki Discord, and we also have this Discuss feature for people to leave wiki comments, and on either you can express your concerns to us and allow us to maybe add content that you want to see added. By ranting on places like Twitter, where we might not have accounts, check, or know about -? We have no means to know criticism was even made, let alone that you are expecting replies or changes.
To the second: we are editing this wiki for free , , , we are three editors that each have different likes and dislikes, and editing for a huge franchise, all for a wiki that was left in diabolical condition from a past administrator, and to which - even now with Alkaid and Jade's help - we're still fixing up to be the best that it can be, in hopes of one day gaining an Official status.
One editor seems to prefer collating information and minor characters, another editor seems to be a huge fan of 2011 material (especially techniques and matches), and - for myself - I prefer certain sets of characters and keeping their stories updated that may have sections missing, especially OG ones.
We don't owe you to edit x pages or y sections, but we will always try to edit those pages anyway when brought up to us, because this is a community project and we wat to help other people. I've often edited certain pages that I may have otherwise ignored due to requests from people. If you won't come to us with your requests, there's one other solution:
Join the wiki and update the articles you want updated.
Sadly, you do have to create an account; anonymous editing tends to be abused by vandals, such as Paddy, when it's enabled, and ironically by the same people making these complaints and criticisms (all off-site where it's unlikely we'll ever see them, or not see them for huge lengths of time). I find it ironic people who think the wiki is so "bad" would purposely make it worse.